Skip to main content

Super Saver Shipping

I must admit, gentle reader, I'm one of those people. When shopping at a particular online store, named after a great river and rain forest, if I happen to hit the "check out" button and receive a message informing me that I must spend just a little more of my hard earned cash to qualify for free shipping, I spend the money. I spend it each and every time. Super Saver Shipping has got to be one of the most ingenious concepts that a retailer has thought of since some baker way back when asked himself, "What if, instead of selling these huge awkward loaves, we sliced the bread?". It does not matter if I have to spend ten more dollars or ten more cents, I will spend (or if I'm real honest with you, over spend) that extra amount to qualify for the free shipping. It's not just that I need an excuse to spend money on myself, I think it actually makes some sense. I tend to look at the situation this way. I could buy one item and pay the money to have it shipped, or I could buy two items and get them shipped for free. Since I would have had to pay shipping on the one item, I mentally deduct the amount that shipping would have cost from the second item. I would have had to pay the shipping price to get the one item, so I might as well put that money toward getting a second item, and in my mind, it's like getting the second item on sale. Like I said, gentle reader, I'm one of those people.

But, now I sense you wondering, "How could using free shipping as an excuse to buy more merchandise possibly help one on their journey to become a real live, honest to goodness, filmmaker"? Well I'll tell you. On one particular occasion I found myself going to checkout with my virtual cart and I needed a little something extra to qualify for the free shipping, so I decided to invest in another screenwriting book. This time I decided I would see what I could learn from the legendary Syd Field.

We have spoken many times before about my love for screenwriting books. I love to buy them. I'm always running out to the mailbox seconds after the postal truck has driven away to see if they have arrived. It's because of the potential they offer. The idea that somewhere in the pages of the book is the secret that will allow me to write the blockbuster movie that I know is inside of me. "How to Write a Movie in 21 Days" was the first time that I purchased a book with more than just the unrealistic hope that it contained some sort of magic within its pages. I bought it as part of a plan. That plan was to sit down at the computer and actually do whatever the book instructed. However, that plan did not work out the way I had hoped. After 21 days I did not have a feature length screenplay. I had fifteen pages and a crushing case of writer's block which had me doubting my ideas, talent, and ability to write feature. Now to be fair, I do not blame Viki King or her book for my situation. I read a lot of reviews for "21 Days" before purchasing it, and many people had a lot of great things to say about it. It just didn't work for me. I needed a little more structure than "21 Days" had to offer. Many people don't like structure. They find it confining and feel it can strangle their creativity with rules and boundaries. I, on the other hand, felt that I needed a few more guideposts to help me define my ideas. I thought that more structure would help me to mold my ideas into a good story. I was at a point in my screenplay where I didn't know what my character should be doing. I knew who they were, I knew what they wanted, I just didn't know what they were going to do, or where they were going to go. They were trapped, and I was blocked. Enter "The Screenwriter's Workbook" by Syd Fields. I think the description on the cover says it all. "Exercises and step-by-step instructions for creating a successful screenplay". I have only one thing to say about that... add to cart. And yes, it shipped for free.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If a Tree Falls in the Forest

At some point or another, gentle reader, we have all been asked the age old question. "If a tree falls in the forest, and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound"? It is supposed to be a thought provoking question. It's purpose is to make us think about the way we view the world around us, and give that world view a closer look. Now, being the son of a science teacher, I always thought the answer to that particular question was a fairly obvious "yes". Sound is produced by vibrations moving through the air. Those vibrations are then sensed by the inner workings of the ear and are in turn, processed by the brain which then categorizes and interprets them. The fact that no one is close enough to the falling tree to sense the vibrations it's falling creates on their eardrum, does not mean that the vibrations weren't present. So, yes it makes a sound. The true question is not whether or not the tree makes a sound, but rather, what purpose do...
4 comments
Read more

The Problem of Perfection

Well, it seems like only last week that I was sitting here musing over the laws of physics and how they could effect the filmmaking process. Overcoming the inertia of sitting still and turning filmmaking dreams into filmmaking nightmares....... I mean realities, is one of the most difficult obstacles for the fledgeling filmmaker to overcome. A contributing factor to this most diabolical of phenomenon, is none other than "The Problem of Perfection". I can hear your voice even now, gentle reader. "What is this, how do you say...... problem of perfection"? Simply put, the problem of perfection comes into effect when said would be filmmaker, is paralyzed into inaction by the fear that their would be film, will not be perfect, or great, or pretty good, or even watchable. When faced with the idea of making something bad, some filmmakers will opt instead to make nothing. Such action, will in turn take away one of the key ingredients necessary to becoming a filmmaker...
4 comments
Read more

Better Late Than Never

Better late than never.  It's a phrase we hear all the time.  I have no idea if it's true or not, but if I had to guess, (and since I'm the one writing this, I do), I would guess that when someone says "better late than never", they are most likely trying to by pass the guilt that tells them whatever is "late" should have been done long ago.  To this sense of guilt they reply, "Look guilt, I know I didn't do what I said I was going to do, at the time I said I was going to do it.  But look here, I did do something.  Things could be worse, you know.  I could have just not done anything.  Then where would you be?  You'd have nothing.  So why don't you just back up off me".      So, the phrase is part acknowledgement of wrong doing, and part dodging responsibility by alluding to another trademark phrase, "things could be worse".  I suppose "better late than never" could be true in certain situations, and I'm ho...
3 comments
Read more